Islamic culture degeneracy and social dis-cohesion (part III)

Category:

A last addition: there wasn't any plan from me to write a third part of the, "Islamic culture degeneracy and social dis-cohesion" but after reading an article from the Herald Sun I've decided to add this last part.

One more reason for Western civilization to despise Islam?

from: Herald Sun

Men sought to kill woman for adultery in Spain

SPANISH police have arrested nine men suspected of seeking to have a woman killed after they accused her of adultery, claiming they were following Islamic law, authorities said.

The men were arrested on November 14 and seven have been held in jail, a police spokesman said.

According to police, the woman had been taken in March and held in an isolated house in Valls in northeastern Catalonia.

Authorities say the men set up a court there to judge her for adultery.

"These men had formed a kind of court to apply (Islamic) sharia law,'' the spokesman said, adding the woman told authorities she was tried and sentenced to death.

She was later able to escape and report what happened to police.

Now following, a couple of questions regarding Islam: Would Islam really be that beneficial to Europe's interests? and... Does Islam poses no threat to Europe values?

In my opinion, we will be very disingenuous to say that Islam is compatible with any principle of democracy and social equality. Islam indeed is, not other than a bunch of unreasoning pretension ideas (and hence not a real religion), created by a false interpreter (Muhammad) of the will of God. And today Islam is guarded by a gang of Islamic extremists to incite gender inequality and to submit to it, the capacity from human minds to think freely.

Islam has a reputation (which it's getting more tainted as time goes by) to defend from the assault of severe criticisms coming from free spirits of this modern era! How it will do it? For sure, by not blowing up or slaughtering innocent's lives to sacrifice in the Allah's name!

Here, I want to emphasize for the sake of argument that in Europe in some respects there are some forms of Islamophobia. Yes, not doubt about it! But, in the same time isn't Europe the most liberal, tolerant, pluralistic society humankind has ever known! Is it?

Why these days standing against Islam's nonsense makes you a racist?

In conclusion, isn't really my intention in this blog to foment any anti-Muslim sentiments but questionings about Islam beneficence toward open societies, and to do it so I want to be able to dispute it without the limitations of expressing myself freely without being called a racist, which eventually even in a partially Islamized society would happened by imposing on me restrictions on my personal freedom of expression. Naturally there is some form of Islamophobia in Europe, but Islam (not doubt about it) is clearly Freedom-phobic.

These last parts aren't mine but I took from a commentary section of the Free Republic:

To: george76

This one’s simple:

Islam is a totalitarian political movement which uses religious symbolism and beliefs to bind together its believers. It’s remarkably effective at confounding the opposition and maintaining group cohesion.

Here in Spain is a great example. Without any sort of prompting or coordination from above, Islam believers, on their own, begin to establish their political structure inside the host’s government and apply their law to their own believers. Communists try to do this in a clumsy manner with “cells” and little groups of believers, but the left is a clumsy buffoon compared to these guys. I’ll be willing to bet that there’s actually a tipping point when a minority of the population is Islamic in which the mass of believers starts undermining the culture and political structure of the host country. It would be interesting to know what that percentage looks like.

In any case, if Islam succeeds in its mission, humanity sinks into a long dark ages berift of reason and individual rights. God help us.

and...

To: redpoll

Here's the gist of it with the exemplar countries stripped out for space and readability considerations:

Islamization of a society begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for discriminatory religious privileges. When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other manifestations tend to infiltrate, eroding and contaminating the culture.

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens.

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize among other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Moslems approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam.

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing genocide), use of Sharia law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels

After 80%, there is daily intimidation and violent jihad, some state-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Islam.

100% supposedly ushers in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace. There is supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved! As in the 100% states above, the most radical Muslims intimidate, spew hatred, violate women and children, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, using rationalizations and corruptions of every basic human decency. Whether in mutilating women or raping young boys, they invoke the name of religion for authority. One only need to recall the killing of innocent female children in Saudi Arabia by religious police, or the atrocities of the Taliban in order to realize that we are in a war where our enemies do not fight by the rules governing civilized nations.